WHY TOP LOOTERS ARE NOT PUNISHED IN INDIA?
Mon, 19 Feb 2018 8:39
WHY TOP LOOTERS LIKE SONIA, KARUNA,PAWAR,ETC, ARE
CBI WAS ONCE CALLED AS 'CONGRESS BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION"
NOW PEOPLE HAVE STARTED CALLING CBI AS 'CHIDAMBARAM BUREAU OF
INVESTIGATION'. SO INFLUENTIAL IS CHIDAMBARAM THAT NO CONGRESSMAN
HAS BEEN BOOKED FOR LOOT - LOOT THAT HAPPENED SINCE THE DATE OF
THE PROBLEM IS THAT THE ENTIRE SYSTEM IS CORRUPT - APART FROM THE
POLITICIANS, CBI, ED, I.T., JUDICIARY, POLICE, IAS, IPS - YOU NAME ANYTHING
CONNECTED WITH GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT - ALL ARE CORRUPT. AND
THE MAN SWINDLES CRORES, BUYS PEOPLE ALL THE WAY, BY GIVING A FEW
CRORES AND ENSURE THAT HE IS NOT PUNISHED. THEN DRINK PARTY, BANGKOK
THAILAND TRIP, HONEY TRAPS ETC. SWINDLER SPLASHES THE PUBLIC MONEY
AND BUYS JUSTICE. AND THERE IS A SAYING IN WESTERN BUSINESS CIRCLE -
THERE IS A PRICE FOR EVERY INDIAN, TO BUY.
NOW PEOPLE WHO SWINDLES IN CRORES, APPOINT THE BEST CHARTERED ACCOUNTING FIRMS, WITH GLOBAL NETWORK.THE FOLLOWING FIRMS
COME TO MY MIND
LEADING ACCOUNTING FIRMS
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, popularly known as just "Deloitte", was founded by William Deloitte in 1845. ...
PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) ...
Ernst & Young (E&Y) ....
Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler (KPMG)
THEY ARE GLOBALLY CONNECTED. THEY TAKE A GOOD SHARE OF LOOTED MONEY
AND TRANSFER THE ILL-GOTTEN WEALTH TO TAX HAVENS ALL OVER THE WORLD,
THEY CREATE HOLDING COMPANIES, TRUSTS, SPORTS ACTIVITY COMPANIES,
THEY MAKE WILLS WHEREBY EVERYBODY GIVES THEIR WEALTH TO THE SWINDLER.
AND THERE IS A BATTERY OF HIGH PAID LAWYERS. SEE SIBAL, SINGHVI, JAITELY
ETC, ARE CROREPATHIS. WHAT THEY DO? THEY ASSIST THE LOOTERS IN CONNIVANCE WITH THE JUDICIARY. DELAYING TACTICS, DOCUMENTS VANISHING
TACTICS, WITNESS VANISHING TACTICS AND SO FORTH AND SO ON.
SINCE OUR AGENCIES ARE BUYABLE, THEY ALSO DELAY THE MATTER FOR 10 TO 15 YEARS. AND WHEN THE CASE COMES UP FOR HEARING, JUDGES LIKE SAINI,ASKS
FOR EVIDENCE - AS IN 2G SWINDLING. SOMEBODY SWINDLES. ACCOUNTANTS,
LAWYERS, CBI, ED, IT, ETC, HELP CAMOUFLAGE THE LOOT. WHEN THE CASE
IS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF EVIDENCE. SWINDLER IS HAPPY, ACCOUNTANTS ARE
HAPPY, LAWYERS ARE HAPPY, POLITICIANS ARE HAPPY, JUDGES ARE HAPPY
AND THE POOR COMMON INDIAN SUFFERS IN POVERTY.
I AM IMAGINING AN EXAMPLE -SUPPOSE, A MAN WORKING IN A PRIVATE FIRM,
STAYING IN A SINGLE TENAMENT HOUSE , BUYS A CAR. HIS NEIGHBOURS, WRITE
TO INCOME TAX DEPT. THAT THIS FELLOW HAS A CAR - BEYOND HIS SOURCE OF
INCOME. I.T. PEOPLE COME AND IF THE MAN DOES NOT CO-OPERATE, HE IS
TAKEN INTO CUSTODY, GIVEN AEROPLANE TREATMENT (HANGING UP-SIDE DOWN
AND HITTING WITH LATHIS, TILL HE TELLS THE TRUTH)..TRUTH COMES OUT OR
THE MAN COLLAPSES. NO JUDGE DISMISSES SUCH CASES, STATING THERE IS
NOW TAKE THE EXAMPLE OF KARTHIK CHIDAMBARAM'S CASE. ED AND CBI,
HAVE 200 PAGE PROOF, TAKEN FROM KARTHIK'S COMPUTERS.
ED HAS CALLED KARTIK TO APPEAR BEFORE IT - SOME 11 TIMES KARTIK AVOIDED
GOING TO ED'S OFFICE. WHY? LAWYERS, JUDGES, FIN.MINISTRY, OFFICERS
IN CBI, ED, ETC, ARE PART OF THE CONGRESS ECO SYSTEM.
ED GOES WITH A PLATE FULL OF SWEETS TO KARTIK'S HOUSE - COME TO DELHI
AND TESTIFY. KARTIK SAYS, I AM GOING TO UK.
ED GOES AGAIN, WITH A BAG FULL OF DRY FRUITS, REQUESTING KARTIK TO
APPEAR BEFORE ED - KARTIK SAYS, I HAVE TENNIS COMMITMENTS. I AM
GOING TO FRANCE.
WHAT IS THE LACUNA IN OUR LEGAL SYSTEM.? THE CORRUPT JUDGES, ASK THE
CBI AND ED TO PROVE THE CASES WITH EVIDENCE. WHEN A MAN LOOTS, WHETHER HE WILL GIVE A STAMPED RECEIPT.
ONCE A PRIMA FACIE CASE IS ESTABLISHED, THE LOOTER SHOULD BE
ARRESTED AND JAILED - HE MUST BE ASKED TO PROVE THAT HE ACQUIRED
ALL THE WEALTH THROUGH LEGITIMATE MEANS. IF HE PROVES HIS INNOCENCE,
THEN HE CAN BE RELEASED.
IF THIS METHOD IS ADOPTED IN KARTIK'S CASE, THEN WITHIN 10 DAYS, THE
CASE WILL COME TO AN END. WHY CBI, ED AND OTHERS ARE NOT ARRESTING
KARTIK AND GIVING HIM AEROPLANE TREATMENT.?
CBI AND JUDICIARY MUST TAKE A STAND ONCE PRIMA FACIE, THE CASE IS ESTABLISHED,IT IS UPTO THE ACCUSED TO PROVE HIS INNOCENCE.CBI, ED, IT, NEED NOT PROVE.
SAINI WANTS CBI TO GIVE EVIDENCE. NAUSEATING.. CAN SAINI EXPLAIN, WHAT
EVIDENCE HE WANTS FROM CBI, ED ETC. WHETHER HE CAN INVESTIGATE ONE
CASE AND FIX THE ACCUSED WITH ALL THE EVIDENCES.?
I PITY SUBRAMANIAM SWAY, GURUMURTHY AND OTHER STALWARTS.ALL THEIR EFFORTS TO CATCH THE LOOTERS,ARE WASTED BECAUSE OF THE STUPID
JUDICIARY, ASKING THE INVESTIGATING AGENCIES TO GIVE EVIDENCE, INSTEAD OF ASKING THE ACCUSED TO PROVE THAT HE ACQUIRED THE WEALTH BY
IF THE JUDICIARY TAKES A STAND THAT IT IS FOR THE ACCUSED TO PROVE
HIS INNOCENCE, MOST OF THE HIGHLY CONNECTED LOOTERS WILL THINK
1000 TIMES BEFORE ATTEMPTING ANOTHER 2G, ANOTHER BOFORS, ANOTHER
IT IS ALSO PUZZLING WHY THE GOVERNMENT IS KEEPING QUIET OVER
SONIA'S HUGE WEALTH - HUGE WEALTH AS REPORTED IN FOREIGN JOURNALS.
I AM ALSO ATTACHING A POSTING ON TAX HAVENS.
PANAMA PAPERS: TOP TEN TAX HAVENS—WHERE THE MONEY IS HIDDEN
BY LUCY CLARKE-BILLINGS ON 4/6/16 AT 10:34 AM
The International Finance Center tower and the Hong Kong skyline shrouded in fog, March 9, 2016.PHILIPPE LOPEZ/GETTY
WORLDPANAMA PAPERSMOSSACK FONSECATAX HAVENSTAX EVASIONTAX AVOIDANCEECONOMYGLOBAL ECONOMY
An astonishing amount of global private financial wealth—$21 to $32 trillion as of 2010—has been invested virtually tax free through the world's black hole of secret tax havens.
The list is made up of 136 predominantly low to middle income countries, but the top 10—which we will give you a run through of—account for 61 per cent of the overall wealth.
Since the late 1970s, investigative journalists, national security experts and tax authorities have gradually become aware that there is a vast deal of money out there, hidden by an elite group of professional enablers in the private banking, legal, accounting and investment industries, taking advantage of the increasingly borderless global economy.
Keep Up With This Story And More By Subscribing Now
But the number is not nailed down because wealth calculated does not include what are known as “non-financial instruments;” in other words—expensive art, yachts, real estate, even blocks of gold. So the lower end of the scale—$21 trillion—is a conservative number.
The word “offshore” also makes us think of a tax haven as being a physical location, which sometimes they are not.
Private banking has become virtual and the term “offshore” refers not so much to the actual physical location of private assets, but to portable, often temporary networks of legal arrangements. It is important to bear this in mind when looking at the list. Not everything is accounted for and the depths of secrecy go way, way down.
“Ultimately, the term ‘offshore’ refers to a set of people,” explains James S. Henry, from the Tax Justice Network. “The key clients being the world’s wealthiest individuals and companies, as well as its worst villains.
“Numbering just a few million of the world’s 6.5 billion people, they are an incredibly diverse group, from 30-year-old Chinese real estate speculators and Silicon Valley software tycoons to Dubai oil sheiks, Russian presidents, mineral-rich African dictators and Mexican drug lords.”
In 2015, the Financial Secrecy Index named the most secretive states across the world. Due to low tax, tight secrecy laws, corporate transparency legislation and a lack of interest in creating public registries of beneficial ownership, the top five were named as Switzerland, Hong Kong, the U.S., Singapore and the Cayman Islands. Britain was placed at 15, and Panama 13.
Here is a rundown of the top ten big players:
Described by James S. Henry from the Tax Justice Network as “the grandfather of the world’s secretive tax havens,” Switzerland is a massively important player in the secrecy world today.
In September 2015, the Swiss Bankers’ Association reported that banks in Switzerland held the equivalent of $6.5 trillion in assets under management, of which it said 51 percent originated from abroad. This made Switzerland the world leader in global cross-border asset management, with a 28 percent share of the market.
The country has made some concessions recently to its iron-clad secrecy laws, under strong international pressure, but it has been a laggard relative to some other big players, like Luxembourg.
Switzerland’s aggressive and apparently illegal pursuit of secrecy-breaking whistleblowers highlights the strength of the Swiss secrecy lobby.
It has committed to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s (OECD) global level Common Reporting Standard (CRS) of automatic information exchange, but it will only start implementing it in 2018.
Hong Kong is one of the world’s fastest growing tax havens today. Its fund management industry had $2.1 trillion under management in April 2015 and over $350 billion in private banking assets.
It has the second largest stock exchange in Asia after Tokyo, it ranks third after New York and London in equities and initial public offerings, and hosts a wide range of financial services players.
In 2015, it had the world’s highest density of Ultra High Net Worth Individuals with personal wealth over $100 million, at 15.3 per 100,000 households.
On paper, Hong Kong accounted for just under half of all foreign investment into China at the end of 2012.
It also has not signed the multilateral agreement to initiate automatic information exchange via the CRS. It has a problematic record on corporate transparency and—unlike European countries—it appears to have little appetite for country-by-country reporting or for creating registers of beneficial ownership.
China’s control over Hong Kong has shielded it from global transparency initiatives, and it still allows owners of bearer shares—vehicles for some of the world’s worst criminal activities—to remain unidentified.
The United States is more of a cause for concern than any other individual country, according to the Financial Secrecy Index, because of both the size of its offshore sector, and also its rather wayward attitude to international cooperation and reform.
The U.S. provides a wide array of secrecy and tax-free facilities for non-residents, both at a federal level and at the level of individual states.
Though the U.S. has been a pioneer in defending itself from foreign secrecy jurisdictions, aggressively taking on the Swiss banking establishment and setting up its technically quite strong Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA), it provides little information in return to other countries, making it a formidable, harmful and irresponsible secrecy jurisdiction at both the federal and state levels.
This former British colony vies with Hong Kong to be Asia’s leading offshore financial center.
According to the Boston Consulting Group in 2015, Singapore held around one eighth of the global stock of total offshore wealth, and an IMF report in 2014 estimated that over 95 percent of all commercial banks in Singapore are affiliates of foreign banks, a testament to its extreme dependence on foreign—and offshore—money.
The Singapore financial center is the region’s largest center for commodity trading, and in 2014 it overtook Tokyo to become Asia’s largest foreign exchange trading center, and the world’s third largest after London and New York.
It hosts substantial activity in insurance, in debt and equity capital markets, in derivatives, and in offshore companies and trusts. It is a major wealth management center, with $1.4 trillion in assets under management in 2013..
As a country, it poses many of the same threats that Hong Kong does—a lack of serious reforms to its corporate secrecy regime and a lack of interest in creating public registries of beneficial ownership.
With banking assets worth $1.4 trillion in June 2014, and hosting over 11,000 mutual and other funds with a net asset value of $2.1 trillion, the Cayman Islands makes the list.
It has 200 banks, over 140 trust companies and over 95,000 registered companies. It is by far the world’s leading domicile for hedge funds, and the second leading domicile for captive insurance companies. Financial services account for well over half of its gross domestic product.
Cayman retains many secrecy features—not least a law that can put people in jail not just for revealing confidential information, but merely for asking for it.
Luxembourg takes secrecy seriously and breaking professional secrecy can result in a prison sentence.
The whistleblowers who exposed the so-called “Luxleaks” scandal went on trial and while Luxembourg has taken action to improve its previously poor track record on providing offshore secrecy, it has continued to expand its role in helping multinational corporations to avoid paying tax in other countries.
It remains a center of lax financial regulation and yet it is one of the world’s most important financial centers.
Luxembourg is the most important private banking and wealth management center in the Eurozone, with 143 banks holding nearly $800 billion in assets, of which over $300 billion is in the secretive private banking sector.
It is the world’s second largest investment fund center after the United States—and fund management, with assets under management worth over $2.5 trillion, is the most important part of the financial center.
The Lebanese scattered population is estimated at anywhere between 5 million and 16 million-strong—larger than Lebanon’s total population of around four million.
Many members of the population are high-net worth individuals and include such world famous names as Carlos Slim, the Lebanese-Mexican telecoms tycoon who is the world’s richest man, Carlos Ghosn, the French-Lebanese-Brazilian boss of carmakers Renault and Nissan, and Nicholas Hayek, a Swiss-Lebanese who runs Swatch, the biggest maker of Swiss watches.
Lebanon’s political and military troubles over recent decades have disrupted the offshore financial sector, but it has proved astonishingly resilient.
Beirut’s offshore financial services sector has been growing at an average of nearly 12 percent per year since 2006, with banking deposits estimated at some $175 billion at the end of 2014.
While other offshore financial sectors have significantly curbed financial secrecy in recent years, Lebanon has sailed against the prevailing winds on global financial transparency.
Germany is a safe haven for dictators’ loot, the assets of organized crime networks, and the proceeds of tax crimes and other illicit financial flows from around the globe.
In his September 2015 book Tax Haven Germany, TJN researcher Markus Meinzer calculated that the amount of tax exempt interest-bearing assets held by non-residents in the German financial system ranged between €2.5 to €3 trillion as of August 2013.
While there has been some recent progress with Germany’s international treaty commitments and anti-money laundering framework, there are still major loopholes and many implementation deficits.
Germany has shown negligent enforcement of anti-money laundering rules, and it offers a worrisome set of secrecy facilities and instruments, such as bearer shares, which were outlawed or severely restricted long ago in many ‘classic’ tax havens.
Like many other OECD countries, Germany does not sufficiently exchange tax-related information, automatically or otherwise, with a multitude of other jurisdictions.
Many foreign-owned assets in Germany are held secretly through elaborate structures spanning secrecy jurisdictions such as Cayman Islands and Switzerland.
Lacking any major remaining oil reserves, Bahrain has made up for this in part by building up an offshore financial center.
Being an island in the Persian Gulf has influenced its history as a trading center, which in turn was a foundation upon which offshore finance has been built.
It is seen as an “island of hospitality” to banks and businesses, as author Geoffrey Jones put it. The financial sector today is the largest employer in Bahrain, contributing to over 25 percent of GDP and employing some 14,000 people.
Bahrain is one of the biggest global centers for Islamic finance, and hosts the largest concentration of Islamic finance institutions in the Middle East. This sector is growing fast, with total assets in the Islamic banking sector rising from $1.9 billion in 2000 to $25.4 billion by November 2014, out of total banking sector assets of $189 billion, according to the Central Bank of Bahrain.
Bahrain was named the world’s fastest growing financial center in 2008 by the City of London Corporation’s Global Financial Centres Index 2008.
There is no corporate income tax, personal income tax or capital gains tax in Bahrain, and Bahrain has quite a wide network of tax treaties with a number of developing countries.
Although the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) describes itself as “an onshore financial center,” Dubai is unquestionably one of the world’s best known tax havens or secrecy jurisdictions.
It is built on a complex array of free trade zones, a low-tax environment and multiple secrecy facilities and lax enforcement. In addition, Dubai has a strong culture of an ask-no-questions, see-no-evil approach to commercial or financial regulation or foreign financial crimes.
It has consequently attracted large financial flows and some of the world’s most high-profile criminals. A significant slice of the inbound money comes in the form of cash or gold.
Like Switzerland, Dubai appears as an island of political and economic stability in a turbulent region.
As The Economist explained in 2013: “This role as a regional hub—and a policy of being open to almost any kind of business—explains why Dubai has been, at least economically, the main beneficiary of the Arab spring.
“Instability in the rest of the region has diverted capital, commerce and people to the emirate. When neighboring Saudi Arabia upped its social spending to pre-empt protests, for instance, much of the cash ended up in Dubai’s shopping malls. More important, the emirate has clearly established itself as the region’s safe haven.”
REQUEST REPRINT OR SUBMIT CORRECTION