Thank you for your esteemed email.
To the best of our knowledge there were NO conditions suggested by India (Our spokesmen: Nehru and Gandhi).
The so-called "Independence talks" very soon degenerated into "Partition Talks" and resulted in the UNCONDITIONAL surrender of India to the INDIAN Muslims represented by All-India Muslim League, led by MA Jinnah.
NB: In fact, the conditions WERE imposed, NOT BY NEHRU, but by JINNAH. Please see at the bottom of this email.
With regard to the Muslims' case for Partition, we can recall what Jinnah said. Firstly he declared that the Muslims in India were not a part of the mainstream population but the SECOND NATION with entirely different culture, religion, language, food, habits, mentality and (Sharia) legal system.
He further said that Muslims, being a minority, feared being overwhelmed in a democratic system of government, and would be "swallowed up" eventually by the Hindu majority, and therefore Pakistan was necessary for their very survival.
Our comments are that by misfortune, or by weakness or ignorance, our Hindu nation let them in, and then could not eject them lock, stock and Koran. Their ISLAMIC "way of life", abduction of girls, rape, forcible conversions, killing cows to eat their flesh (beef), and destruction of temples, became clear to all the Hindus from Day 1. Yet the Hindus fell and became slaves just like the natives of Latin America.
The points made by Jinnah were absurd and incendiary, and totally against the grain of Hindu thought, belief, deeds and values, but were ACCEPTED by both Nehru and Gandhi quite calmly when they CONCEDED Partition without any objection, argument, fight and even referendum. The least they could have INSISTED ON was Population Exchange.
Our leaders even went further in appeasing the Muslims when they conceded special privileges and rights to the only Muslim majority State (J&K) in Bharat!
Quarter of a century later Nehru's daughter recognised the Muslims as SECOND NATION when the Indian army had defeated the Pakistani army and OCCUPIED East Bengal in 1972. The territory was "dutifully" returned to ISLAM instead of bringing it under our own Secular flag. Like Nehru she had no real love for Secularism but only love for Muslims. East Pakistan did not join West Bengal but became Bangladesh. It can be said that while Nehru was the "Father" of Pakistan, his daughter Indira was the "Mother" of Bangladesh!
Neither of them served the interests of India or Secularism! Neither of them was loyal to the country they ruled- just like Jinnah who was NOT loyal to the country where he was born.
The result of NOT laying down the condition of orderly and State-managed "population exchange" (double TREASON by Nehru and Gandhi) was that some two million Hindus were KILLED, thousands of girls and women were raped and abducted, and nearly 10 to 15 million Hindus forcibly expelled from Pakistan. The lucky ones who could escape became REFUGEES in their own country, left to their own devices to survive.
STATE MANAGED "population exchange" would have been a peaceful affair and NO life, both Hindu as well as Muslim, would have been lost!
Best wishes and regards
In a message dated 22/09/2014 00:57:23 GMT Daylight Time, XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX writes:
would you kindly enlighten about the conditions of the partition as also reasons given by muslim league/Jinnah with your comments.
FIVE CONDITIONS OF PARTITION
(“PANCH SHEEL” OF NEHRU)
MUSLIM AGGRESSION bore fruit. They succeeded in occupying one third of India overnight, and in exterminating the Non Muslims (i.e., HINDUS) living there.
HINDU RESPONSE was Surrender unconditional, Run and FORGET.
Response by Indian Armed Forces: ZERO. They, too, packed up instantly and vacated those “citadels of defence” (Cantonments) in Peshawar, Rawalpindi, Lahore, Multan, Quetta and Karachi in utmost haste and vacated (vanished from) their own territory.
In 1940 we had All-India Congress Party in league (secret collusion) with All-India Muslim League that was suddenly thrown into limelight by the British rulers who believed in the policy of “Divide & Rule”, and “Partition and Depart”!
It was the separatist Muslims who had thought of creating an Islamic country within India as early as 1936 when a few Muslim students in London coined the word “Pakistan”.
To the discredit of Hindu leaders none took a serious note of the new lethal treasonous idea that started growing rapidly like poisonous weed among the Indian Muslims.
After the end of World War 2 in August 1945 the seed had grown full height into a poisonous tree.
While senile “Bapu” MK Gandhi lived in his own make-believe unrealistic world of “Hindu-Muslim Bhai Bhai”, it was cunning barrister Jawaharlal Nehru who stepped in the VACUUM and claimed to represent India at the so-called “Independence” talks that ended in the mutilation of (Akhand) Bharat.
Nehru’s conduct needs a closer scrutiny. That he never mentioned to Mohammed Ali Jinnah, the leader of Indian Muslims, “United We Stand, Divided We Fall,”, is no more a mystery. (Please note how earnestly all the British leaders went into action and succeeded in persuading the separatist (Second Nation of) Scots to stay within the United Kingdom in Referendum held on 18 September 2014).
Nehru was literally the “Son of a Mohammed” himself, and his job was tough and dangerous- to destroy the Hindu nation from within by agreeing to break up India while at the same time projecting himself as a champion of Secularism, friend of Hindus and a patriot as well as an indomitable freedom fighter.
Hindus have never dared to look at their rulers with a critical eye since the first Hindu critic had his eyes gouged out before being beheaded in public by the Mohammedan invaders from Arabia in 712 AD.
Thereafter it was the British who shot and hanged the critics of regime in their thousands. Thus a tradition set in to blindly follow the one in front like the sheep approaching the edge of the precipice.
How wide awake could the Hindu nation have been in 1940’s can be judged even today in 2014 AD, when they trust an alien Non Hindu female from ITALY to lead the All India Congress Party with their dog like loyalty, many until recently calling her the “uncrowned Empress of Hindusthan”.
Nehru himself had described the state of patriotism and awareness of the Hindus more accurately than anyone else. When an aide pointed out the possibility of a patriot firing a shot at him if he agreed to Partition, he quipped, “Hindus will not only accept Partition but also celebrate it!” The aide was left speechless.
His Constitution of "Jackals” does not even allude to the sudden disappearance of Lahore, Multan, Karachi, Dhaka and Chittagong from the map of Bharat but does recognize, and benefit, the only Muslim majority State of J & K, under its irremovable Article 370.
Haven’t we often wondered as to what the terms and conditions of Partition really were? Shame, if we haven’t!
“We wish there were some, or at least one!”, replied a Hindu professor of history.
And what would that have been if there was to be just ONE condition?
“Expel the devils lock stock and Koran from Partitioned India,” said his wife instantly as if by reflex action.
But there were conditions, though not from Nehru or Gandhi, the leaders of Hindusthan and the sons of soil, but from the leader of the MUSLIMS, Mohammed Ali Jinnah.
Offensive and preposterous though they were (or look to us today), our perennial ENEMY met with no resistance, challenge or fight from the HINDU side.
Neither Nehru nor Gandhi mentioned exchange of population or Referendum. Neither demanded time to comprehend the future implications of Partition for the Muslims in Bharat and the Hindus who would be trapped and wiped out in Pakistan, or, merely to think it over.
The conditions that were then dictated were fully backed and endorsed by Britain, our colonial master, and, astonishingly, accepted by Gandhi, Nehru and their “All-India Congress Party” that claimed to represent ALL the Indians throughout the country-from Kashmir to Kerala and from Khyber to Chittagong.
Demoralised Hindu & Sikh leaders, who became even more self-negating and self-sacrificing “secular goats” under Gandhi’s influence, held their breath while cancer eaten “skeleton” of Mohammed Ali Jinnah proclaimed his conditions, one by one. (Jinnah died an agonising death in Karachi on 11 September 1948, just over a year after Pakistan's creation. We ought to reflect on his companions in Hell.)
At that critical juncture in our history Jawaharlal Nehru was correctly noticed by some smart Hindus to be the illegitimate son of a Muslim, the secret agent of Anglo-Islamic Axis, who stood solidly on the side of Jinnah. Some whispered, "Traitor Nehru can give away the whole of Hindusthan to his Muslim "brothers" for a song!"
Nehru never uttered a single word to support “Akhand Bharat” as if our ancient land of Vedas and wisdom was a mere rag bag. With Nehru turned into an enemy, the full brunt of fighting Partition fell on the loin cloth (“langoTi”) clad Bapu Gandhi who had already shown his commitment to non-violence, conciliation, appeasement and, therefore, unconditional surrender (“tyaag”).
This put the Hindus in extremely vulnerable and dangerous position. The Sikhs, with the loss of Sri Nankana Sahib and the surrender of Lahore (75% Hindu/Sikh presence) were utterly shattered. Mohammed Ali Jinnah had his Pakistan in his hand and our Hindusthan under his foot.
Emboldened by British support, Jinnah’s dictation to all the terrified Hindu leaders, “Be-waqoof” Baldev Singh among them, seemed like one determined cat addressing the vast assembly of mice.
FIVE CONDITIONS OF PARTITION:
1. LOCAL (not overall) MAJORITY. “Wherever we are in majority that territory will belong to our Rasul Allah Mohammed of Mecca, in perpetuity. You will surrender all that land unconditionally.”
“Yes, Sir, we agree. Pray carry on,” said Gandhi and Nehru, listening meekly.
“For those territories that you surrender we shall write up, and enforce, ISLAMIC Constitution that will be based on the teachings of KORAN. We shall treat all the KAFIRS, i.e., Non Muslims, as prescribed in The Book.”
“Yes, Sir, we agree. Pray carry on,” said Gandhi and Nehru meekly, trembling while listening.
3. HOLOCAUST OF HINDUS.
We reserve the right to carry out total ethnic cleansing of Hindus and Sikhs by murdering, abducting, raping millions, and expelling tens of millions from their homes, degrading them in our ISLAMIC Pakistan by denying them EQUALITY with the Muslims who will be free to abduct and rape a non-Muslim female and if she complains, she will be required to produce FOUR male witnesses to support her accusation.
You will watch like the sheep in abattoir your fellow Hindus being killed in Kashmir, East Bengal, Sindh, even Uganda and Fiji, but do nothing while silently waiting for your own turn. In the case of all “mixed marriages”, the non-Muslim bride will embrace Islam at once, or face DEATH.”
“Yes, Sir, we agree. Pray carry on,” said Gandhi and Nehru meekly, listening.
4. SPECIAL RIGHTS FOR MUSLIMS IN “BROKEN” BHARAT.
“Thou shalt not touch the whiskers of a Mohammed in Hindusthan. Your government will undertake to safeguard life and property of each and every Muslim citizen while we reserve the right to do ethnic cleansing in accordance with the Will of Allah. In cinemas NO Hindu actor will be seen doing any love scene or dance with a Muslim actress while Muslim actors will have full freedom to dance, kiss, play, strip & bare (naked) any Hindu actress.”
“Yes, Sir, we agree. Pray, hurry up. We need to start breathing.” said Gandhi and Nehru meekly, holding their breath.
5. TERRITORIAL ENCROACHMENT. Finally let it be clear upon you that any territory or land that is once under the foot of Mohammed (i.e., “Islamic”), will belong to MOHAMMED of MECCA in perpetuity.
Any territory or land that is once ours will never be yours. Accordingly, not only West Pakistan but also East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) and any part of Kashmir captured by us, will remain ISLAMIC for ever.”
“Yes, Sir, we agree. Thank you,” said Gandhi and Nehru, mighty relieved that the Islamic “PANCHSHEEL” had come to an end and they could breathe normally again.
YES, the lives of our despicable cowardly “netas” had been spared though MILLIONS of ordinary citizens of Bharat lost theirs as a direct result of “buying peace” from the Devil.
It was like Chamberlain’s “Peace with Honour” agreement with HITLER in 1938. Hindusthan, known as “Bharat Mata”, or “Mother India”, shrank in size and acquired her most disgusting map outline. Nehru was an accomplice while Gandhi had “bought” his peace.
Dear honourable & patriotic citizens of Bharat and NRI’s across the world, this then is the Truth, nothing else but the TRUTH, behind that word “Independence” that the Government of India, especially “All-India Congress Party” and all those who form part of the EVIL AXIS of “Italy, Islam, Nehru Dynasty & the Hindu slaves” celebrate year after year on August 15.
It is up to us (and our genuine leaders like Narendra Modi) to encourage the entire brainwashed and demoralised nation to become bold and brave in order to revive our stand on “Akhand Bharat”.
It is up to us to open our eyes and see the Truth. It is up to us to demand a TRIAL of Jinnah, Nehru and Gandhi for HIGH TREASON. Such trial can never be time barred like the trial of Bofors Chor.
It is up to the PEOPLE of India to unite and then become a MIGHTY FORCE to reckon with. Shedding the traits of “jackals” but acquiring the guts of “lions” we all should step forward and exterminate the anti Hindu, anti secular and anti national “vermin” who have been ruling and fooling our great nation of one billion since the Day of Partition in 1947.
Partition was the DEATH of our cherished “Akhand Bharat” (Divine Mother India).
Who on earth is such despicable scum (“ZALEEL”) to “celebrate” the death of his mother?
Accordingly, on August 15 next, there should be nationwide BLACK FLAG rallies and black ribbons to remind us of the worst defeat and surrender in our history, and then to rejuvenate the supine nation to recover the surrendered territory and march towards the goal of “RAAM RAAJYA”.