Date: 24 Oct 2011


The writer, while writing about Libya, seems to have unwittingly described the "democracy" in Bharat. Partitioned Indian Secular State (P.I.S.S.) , too, is "a ground already fertile with sectarian, communal and ethnic strife." \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ NEHRU Dynasty and All-India Congress Party have taken advgantage of the apoliitical passive nature of the Hindus and treacherously deleted the word "PARTITION" from Constitution in order to embrace the MOHAMMEDANS due to terror of Islam & Mohammed. TRUTH HAS BEEN SWEPT UNDER THE CARPET. \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ As a direct result there is even less internal unity in (BROKEN|) Bharat due to the presence of "Second Nation" that captured 364,351 sq. miles of India** in 1947 while staying back for eventual strike. For her survival India must annul Partition or kick out the Muslims. If she is too weak to do either then at least the Constitution must be amended to define the Muslims as "Second Nation" in Partitioned India. Thus they will have the same constitutionalo status in Indai as the Hindus in Pakkistan and Bangladsh.\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ -Prahlad, Rajput and Bose\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ (Multan, Lahore and Dhaka-eternally Indian) \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ ** Area of Pakistan 796,095 km2 (307,374 sq mi)\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ Area of Bangladesh: 147,570 km2 (56,977 sq mi)\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ That was, is, and always wil be, an integral part of Akhand Bharat like East Punjab, West Bengal and South Kashmir. No power on earth can tell India to "shut up and lump it (Partition)!" \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ ========= In a message dated 24/10/2011 03:47:46 GMT Daylight Time,xxxxxxxxxx writes: It will be na´ve to reject this scenario. Democracy based on internal unity is the key for a better future; not geopolitical division and internationalising crises to invite foreign intervention in a ground already fertile with sectarian, communal and ethnic strife. 000000000