part-time jobs online for students

date: 29 jul 2009



comment:



contributed.



i picked up a leaflet from my local gurdwara, i reflected on the title, "why sikhs should not celebrate indian independence," 



i was disappointed. this title seems to be brainchild of some young sikhs who are much in anguish by the events of 1984 but without the knowledge of either sikh history, or of the partitioned india. 

 

sikh youngsters are advised to co-opt some 65+, too, on their consultation/advisory boards whose knowledge goes back a lot more. 

 

1984 attack was not one off, or an event in isolation or unrelated to the previous defeat & disaster of 1947.

 

one's reaction to this line, therefore, is as follows:-



not only the sikhs but the hindus, too, should not celebrate this bogus & treacherous independence. here are the reasons:



while the sikhs lost lahore the hindus lost karachi, quetta, peshawar, rawalpindi, north kashmir, sylhet and dhaka.

 

so, why should they celebrate their worst ever defeat at the hands of the muslims who came out victorious with one third of india placed under koran. the vast territories captured by them became the islamic republic of pakistan in which by constitution the status of a hindu is worse than that of a pet dog.

so, why should they celebrate their worst ever defeat at the hands of the muslims who came out victorious with one third of india placed under koran. the vast territories captured by them became the islamic republic of pakistan in which by constitution the status of a hindu is worse than that of a pet dog.


 


while baldev singh, the sikh spokesman, was the stooge of nehru, "bapu" mk gandhi and bandit jawaharlal nehru were both stooges of the muslim leader, mr mohammed ali jinnah. 


 


the hindus may have been sorry to see the british go but were openly delighted to see their former muslim masters walk away with one third of india.





while the sikhs' backbone was broken the hindus lost their head, guts and limbs.


 


1947 was the litmus test of all the communities living in india. the muslims attacked, the hindus ran, accepting defeat, while the sikhs were forced to pack their belongings in order to flee west punjab. 





right now the muslims have exterminated the hindus in south kashmir, too. over a quarter of a million of them are refugees sheltering in india.





so really, only the muslims should celebrate, the hindus should hang their heads in eternal shame and the sikhs should mourn the surrender of lahore and sri nankana sahib due to lack of vision.





the sikhs should also be aware that while the genocide of 1947 was beyond their control, the one of 1984 was brought about by their own cowardice, ignorance and disunity. 


 


until that year (1984) the sikhs had been celebrating independence with the hindu ?ackals? who are now adoring their italian born "mother" (rashtramata) sonia maino.


 


guru gobind singh ji left punjab to take his mission to naded in maharashtra. the sikhs should similarly call on the hindus to boycott the celebration of the so-called independence but commemorate the bloody partition of india which is now broken bharat or partitioned indian secular state (p.i.s.s.). 





000000000



000000000

Service Unavailable

Service Unavailable


HTTP Error 503. The service is unavailable.