SURRENDERS BEFORE ISLAM. BANNING ENTRY OF GEERT WILDERS, DUTCH MP.
Date: 12 Feb 2009
We don't need to go all the way to UK (http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/video/20060203LondonProtest.wmv) to see politicians and ultra-secularists unethical capitulation to these fanatics, just look in our own back yard in Bharat. Please read this BBC article on Kolkata http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7883612.stm
It concerns the erosion of the right to criticise religions. In it, the author, Johann Hari, writes: "I don't respect the idea that we should follow a 'Prophet' who at the age of 53 had sex with a nine-year old girl, and ordered the murder of whole villages of Jews because they wouldn't follow him."
These extremists are using the situation very well to their advantage. When it comes to demanding their rights they are talking of Indian Penal Code to protect their religious feelings by burning national property but they don't mind suppressing other people's Right to Freedom of Speech to criticize any religion or to Right to Worship by denying land as in case of Shri Amarnathji. They want the best of two worlds. They are fine with Indian law when the punishment is less strenuous than their archaic & violent Sharia but want Islamic Personal law also to oppress others and enjoy the fruits of 4 marriages, etc.
In above mentioned London Protest video they (which includes small kids) are openly cursing, supporting Osama, and giving hate speeches in public under the protection of the very same umbrella of right to freedom of speech which they are denying to others like by giving life threats to Wilders (http://www.spectator.co.uk/melaniephillips/3344161/britain-capitulates-to-terror.thtml) for exercising his freedom of expression by making Fitna to speak his mind out on Islam. Who is leading it? UK's very own member of House of Lords, some Lord Ahmed.
2009/2/11 Yogesh Khatri <email@example.com>