typing jobs from home without investment and registration fees

date: 12 aug 2008



comment:



panch sheel** of partition.



for those under 60 who may not know the truth.



at the end of world war ii that had sapped the energies of britain as a colonial power and the new age of democracy was beginning, there was hope for india to be free at last.



a high powered round table conference was called in new delhi. main participants were: (1) lord louis mountbatten the viceroy, (2) mr. mk gandhi, spiritual leader of the hindus; (3) pandit jawaharlal nehru the clever barrister-at-law and shrewd ideological master, gandhi and nehru claimed to speak on behalf of all the indians, including the muslims. next was (4) mohammed ali jinnah, former president of all-india congress party, earlier a firm believer in secularism but now a turncoat and diehard muslim separatist who claimed to represent all the muslims of india. (5) finally, to give it a tripartite colour, one baldev singh, who was nehru? ?oodle?just as manmohan singh, being the will of people, is regarded by many as sonia? poodle today. 



baldev singh, brought up on the ?leep inducing lullaby?of love all mankind, had no political base or religious conviction of his own but, encouraged by the rulers, claimed to speak for all the sikhs. 



what was obviously most abominable was the suppression of hindu mahasabha by the british and bandit nehru? elevation of all india muslim league at these talks that were going to decide the fate of bharat, the ancient land of hindus.



the muslims had a man to speak for them but the hindus and the sikhs did not even have a ?oat?to speak for them. the final verdict was totally one-sided- in favour of the muslims. those who were supposed to safeguard our rights were in league with the enemy. while claiming to be secular they had no shame and felt no disgust in surrendering secularism at the feet of islam. 



this left the hindus with none to speak on their behalf. such glaring betrayal of the majority community, who are native to the soil, would be incomprehensible and inconceivable today. muslim voice was heard loud and clear but hindu voice was silent.



during the previous countless centuries of slavery hindu politics were reduced to pitiable state of existence, fine-tuned to submission, adjustment, accommodation, appeasement and surrender. with dignity lost, there was only the wish just to survive. in the previous one thousand years not once was there a hindu ruler in delhi who could put pride back in hindu body. the defeat and exile of the last mogul emperor, mohammed shah zafar, in 1857 was immediately followed by british occupation of the entire sub continent.



what was discussed at these so-called independence talks was less about independence but all about creation of pakistan, a new state for the indian muslims. absurd though the new country was, by every yardstick of economy, industry, religion, politics and race, the muslims of india were delighted. they had been given the choice to stay back, or to move to their new country. for the hindus such ?hoice?was theoretical, only on paper. in practice they were going through holocaust in the middle of 20th century. like the jews under nazi regime, hindus and sikhs were massacred indiscriminately, abused as ?afirs?(infidels).



there were learned and decent jews and there were learned and decent hindus. both were butchered without mercy or compassion by savages in broad daylight.



what were the terms and conditions of partition? we wish there were any. 



if any, the terms were dictated by mohammed ali jinnah and his all-india muslim league, offensive and preposterous as they were, the enemy met with no fight, resistance or challenge. please don? forget that these were dictated by the indian muslims, fully backed and endorsed by britain and accepted by india. hindu leaders who became terribly secular in fear, held their breath while mr. jinnah was speaking. here are those conditions:- 



five conditions of partition of india

1.  majority

?herever we happen to be in majority that territory will belong to our rasul allah mohammed in perpetuity. you will surrender all that land unconditionally.?


?es, sir, we agree. pray carry on,?said gandhi and nehru meekly, listening.



2.  islamic constitution

?n territories that you surrender we shall write up and enforce islamic constitution that will be based on teachings of our koran. according to it we shall treat all the kafirs, i.e., non muslims, as defined and described in the koran.?


?es, sir, we agree. pray carry on,?said gandhi and nehru meekly, listening.



3.  right to degrade as citizens and exterminate

we reserve the right to degrade and humiliate the non muslims in our pakistan by classifying them as second class citizens and by denying them access to top constitutional and executive posts in our country. all muslims will be free to seduce, abduct or rape a non muslim female and if she complains, she will be required to produce four male witnesses to support her accusation. failing this she will be stoned to death in accordance with sharia law. in the case of all mixed marriages, the non muslim spouse will embrace islam or face death.



?es, sir, we agree. pray carry on,?said gandhi and nehru meekly, listening.



4.  thou shalt not touch the whisker of a momin

your government will undertake to safeguard life and property of each and every muslim citizen in bharat while we reserve the right to ethnic cleansing, gradual or rapid, in accordance with the will of allah. in cinemas no hindu actor will be seen doing any love scene with a muslim actress while muslim actors will have full freedom and approval of your government and people to play such romantic scenes with hindu actresses.?


?es, sir, we agree. pray, hurry up. we need to start breathing.?said gandhi and nehru meekly, listening.



5.   finally let it be clear upon you that any territory or piece of land that is once under muslim foot, belongs to islam in perpetuity. any territory or piece of land that is once ours will never be returned, not even a square inch of it. accordingly not only mainland pakistan to the west but also east bengal to the east and any part of kashmir captured by us will remain islamic for ever.?


?es, sir, we agree. thank you,?said gandhi and nehru, mighty relieved that they could breathe once again normally.

?es, sir, we agree. thank you,?said gandhi and nehru, mighty relieved that they could breathe once again normally.


          ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------


this then is the truth, nothing else but the truth behind that word ?ndependence?that the government of india, especially all-india congress party and all those who form part of the evil axis of ?taly, islam & the pseudo-secular hindu.?




it is up to the hindu leaders to de-brainwash the nation. it is up to us to open our eyes and see the truth. it is up to us to demand a trial of nehru and gandhi for high treason. it is up to the people of india to unite and then step forward along the road to destiny after exterminating the anti hindu, anti national ?ermin?who are ruling and fooling the nation of one billion since the day of partition in 1947,





transfer of population


muslims of india cannot have bharat? blood and pound of flesh, too. any agreement that is signed by any party under duress or threat is invalid and ought to be rejected by an honourable people. only a despicable coward will say after his daughter is snatched from his house, ? am too weak to free her. so i do not want her back.?he must do all in his power to free his daughter and also teach an unforgettable lesson to the abductor. may we know what action has india taken to recover all those surrendered territories and what action have the sikhs taken to recapture lahore??





we all cry, ?other india,?when we feel patriotic, and we all regard lahore to be the heart of india where bhagat singh was hanged to death, making that soil indian in perpetuity, where guru arjun dev was tortured to death, making that soil hindu in perpetuity. we should all unite to liberate sri nankana sahib, the birth place of guru nanak dev. when was mohammed ever seen walking in lahore or peshawar? the farthest he himself went was jerusalem to destroy the temple of jews and the farthest his kith & kin went was karbala (lit. kar=do; bala=calamity) where they were all slain or captured in 680 a.d by the forces of caliph yazid i.





hindus should invite all indians to wear black ribbons on august 15 every year in memory of our own kith & kin killed and the properties destroyed and our fields, farms and holy places lost. there is no need to erect statues of, and name the roads, tournaments and institutions after any imposter calling herself ?andhi?or sitting in the chair of rashtrapati,





we should strive to teach secularism, tolerance and, above all, patriotism, to each and every ?eliever?in false god of koran called allah. such an allah, who does not care in the least over the offensive & provocative islamic flag over nankana sahib (when they themselves would not like to see trishul flying over mecca), and over the birth place of apostle of peace guru nanak, and also over lahore where apostle of tolerance & sacrifice, guru arjun dev, was tortured to death as well as patriot bhagat singh was hanged to death for the crime of seeing lahore, punjab and the rest of india independent of foreign rule. (if islam from arabia is not even more crude, savage, intolerant and offensive than the alien british rule, then what is it?)





without fear of our ruling & fooling congress party and its president, the italian born sonia khan (aka gandhi), we should declare from every public platform, ?khand bharat?amar rahe!?till the frontiers are restored to where they stood on august 14, 1947. 





transfer of population


but if we feel weak, forced, obliged or compelled to accept two bogus, artificial and dangerous islamic republics on either side of india, then the only alternative would be complete transfer of population. 





muslims have no place in secular india after establishing their islamic republics of pakistan and bangladesh on the soil of ancient civilization called bharat. we need not shed any tear for a ?ood?muslim since there is no good muslim if he believes in the book that defines the worst of them as a muslim but the best of ours in the most derogatory manner as an infidel or kafir. we have heard this word too often even right in our home (bharat). 



muslims have no place in secular india after establishing their islamic republics of pakistan and bangladesh on the soil of ancient civilization called bharat. we need not shed any tear for a ?ood?muslim since there is no good muslim if he believes in the book that defines the worst of them as a muslim but the best of ours in the most derogatory manner as an infidel or kafir. we have heard this word too often even right in our home (bharat). 



it is time to launch a psychological counter offensive by coining a suitable antonym to "kafir". what about ?aadar-kush?for killing mother (india) in which all the ?athers of pakistan?were born? any more suggestions? of course nothing can be as rude, crude and offensive as the word ?afir?that occurs so often in koran.



finally it is time to realize that a muslim majority anywhere means secession. see cyprus, see kosovo, see pakistan itself. see western china, see southern thailand. see southern philippines. the conclusion must be: do not let the muslims exceed, proportionally, the number of the hindus in bangladesh and of the sikhs in pakistan. it is not merely fair. it is the only guarantee of our survival in a country where ?he muslims have landed?

 

** http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/panchsheel

   ===================







000000000

Service Unavailable

Service Unavailable


HTTP Error 503. The service is unavailable.