date: 08 nov 2006 comment: +-----------------------------------------+ as the author has correctly written, hindus lost to muslim invaders even after putting up a brave fight. and then bharat was rules by the brit barbarians and parts of it by others. bharat is no longer hindu -- hasn't been so for centuries. the government is not a hindu government and true hindus are a minority in the population. bharat today does not have what it would take to successfully combat further islamization, christianization, americanization, or terrorism. finally, isn't the author's urging "let there be no further shrinking of india" merely wishful thinking at this point? in my opinion, unfortunately, the answer is in the affirmative. =============================== > > http://www.centralchronicle.com/20061103/0311305.htm > > how did muslims demand pakistan? > > by j. g. arora > > in the time tested words of sun tzu, the celebrated > author of the art of > war, "if you know the enemy and know yourself, you > need not fear the result of > a hundred battles. if you know neither the enemy nor > yourself, you will > succumb in every battle." > india's refusal to know its enemies has brought > frequent pak-bangla > terrorist attacks as also crores of pak-bangla > infiltrators threatening to create one > more islamic country on indian soil. to understand > the reasons of pak-bangla > aggression, it is essential to know how pakistan > came into existence. > > entire indian sub-continent including the > present day india, pakistan, > bangladesh, nepal, afghanistan and even a part of > iran was hindu land with > no muslim presence till muhammad bin qasim's arab > army attacked sindh in 711. > though hindus fought bravely to defend their > religion and motherland, they > lost afghanistan in 987, and suffered the loss of > millions of lives and plunder > and destruction of thousands of temples during the > repeated muslim invasions > for over a thousand years since they never cared to > know about their enemy. > > muslim league's demand for pakistan > after muslim rule, india was under the > british from 1857 to 1947 when > muslim league was formed in 1906. muslim league > demanded pakistan for muslims > in march, 1940. > this is what muhammad ali jinnah (1876-1948), > known among pakistanis > as baba-e-qaum (father of the nation) and > quaid-e-azam (the great leader), said > in lahore on 23rd march, 1940 while moving the > resolution for the creation > of pakistan: > > "hindus and muslims belong to two different > religions, philosophies, > social customs, and literatures. they neither > inter-marry nor inter-dine > together, and indeed they belong to two different > civilisations which are based > mainly on conflicting ideas and conceptions. it is > quite clear that hindus and > muslims derive their inspiration from different > sources of history. they have > different epics, different heroes and different > episodes. very often the > hero of one is a foe of the other, and likewise > their victories and defeats > overlap. to yoke together two such nations under a > single state, one as a > numerical minority and the other as a majority, > must lead to growing discontent, and > the final destruction of any fabric that may be so > built up for the > government of such a state." > > further, the said pakistan resolution > demanded a separate homeland for > the muslims of india with these words, "�the > areas in which the muslims are > numerically in a majority as in the north-western > and eastern zones of india > should be grouped to constitute 'independent > states' in which the > constituent units shall be autonomous and > sovereign." > "direct action day" > though the congress party continued its > policy of muslim appeasement, > it could not dissuade muslim league from demanding > pakistan for muslims. in > the elections held in 1945-46, muslims voted for > the creation of pakistan. > muslim league launched direct action day on > august 16, 1946 to attain > pakistan. this action resulted in slaughter of > thousands of innocents. > ultimately, the congress conceded the demand > for pakistan. and 1947 > saw the shrinking of indian boundaries, and > emergence of pakistan comprising of > west pakistan (the present day pakistan) and east > pakistan (the present day > bangladesh). > most of indian muslims who had demanded > pakistan for muslims and > exchange of population on creation of pakistan > stayed back in india; and did not > go to pakistan. > creation of pakistan saw eviction of most of > hindus and sikhs from > pakistan and bangladesh. though hindus accounted > for 24 per cent of pakistan's > population in 1947; now number just one per cent. > in bangladesh, hindus > numbered 30 per cent in 1947; but now number eight > per cent. however, in india, > present percentage of muslim population is much > higher than that in 1947. > "pakistan day" > every year, 23rd of march is celebrated as > 'pakistan day', and is a > holiday in pakistan. 23rd march is central to > pakistan's existence. on 23rd > march, 1956, pakistan (including the present day > bangladesh) was declared as an > bangladesh) was declared as an > islamic republic. east pakistan became independent > as bangladesh in 1971; and > has been declared as an islamic republic in 1988. > not content with driving out hindus and sikhs > from pakistan and > bangladesh, pak-bangla combine wants to create one > more islamic country on indian > soil. to achieve this mission, pakistan and > bangladesh have dispatched > countless terrorists and crores of their nationals > into india. > march 23, 1940 (pakistan) resolution > reproduced above debunks > multi-culturalism being propagated by fake > secularists, left-liberals and other > anti-hindu forces in india. the said resolution > exposes hollowness and falsehood > of anti-hindu multi-cultural industry. besides, the > proponents of > multi-culturalism cannot explain why none of the > multi-culturalism cannot explain why none of the > world's 57 islamic countries including > pakistan and bangladesh believes in > multi-culturalism or in extending equal > rights to its non-muslim population. > why to forget history? > as per george santayana (1863-1952), "those > who do not remember the > past are condemned to repeat it". > besides being forgotten, history is also > being falsified by some > sections to paint a rosy picture of muslim rule in > india, and to ignore heroic > hindu resistance to muslim invaders. > though muslim league demanded pakistan as a > permanent settlement of > hindu-muslim problem in the sub-continent, every > one in india seems to have > forgotten the lahore resolution of 23rd march, 1940 > demanding pakistan. and the > present congress-led upa government is sharing > power with muslim league, and > demanding reservation for muslims in government > jobs and educational > institutions though there can be no reservation on > the basis of religion, and though > such reservation for muslims in india after the > creation of pakistan is > untenable. > though indian history echoes with blood and > terror, no effort to learn > from history and prevent future terrorist attacks > is being made. > way out > india is suffering pak-bangla demographic > aggression and terrorism > since it has forgotten how pakistan had come into > existence in 1947. > instead of persisting with a farcical > indo-pak and indo-bangla "peace > process", india must deport crores of pak-bangla > infiltrators and curb their > daily influx. besides, in keeping with the doctrine > of "hot pursuit" of > international law, terrorist training network in > pakistan and bangladesh must be > smashed; and if necessary, an all out war launched > with these hostile nations. > enemies must be crushed; not welcomed and > embraced. chanakya niti as > also sun-tzu's celebrated 'art of war', and > countless episodes of world > history emphasize the crushing of enemies before > the enemies crush us. > how much more must india lose before it > confronts its enemies? india > has already shrunk. let there be no further > shrinking of india. > will india remember m.a. jinnah's words > uttered in lahore on 23rd > march, 1940, and take pre-emptive action to avoid > repetition of the events of > 1947? 000000000
HTTP Error 503. The service is unavailable.