will the housewives of new jersey return

date: 10/10/2005

will the housewives of new jersey return

dear sir/madam, /// with reference to letters about the disappearance of pigs from britain, the forwarded article will be of interest to your readers. /// i can only suggest that you save anything to do with pigs. in few years time these will become collectors items. /// i have saved tesco bags with pigs pictures, they have diasppeared since the last few years. /// pr /// ++++++++++++++++++++++ xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: /// > date: thu, 6 oct 2005 20:00:46 -0700 (pdt) > subject: [waronterror] britain's war on pigs by robert spencer ///> > http://frontpagemagazine.com/articles/readarticle.asp?id=19712 > /// britain's war on pigs by robert spencer > /// > pigs are disappearing all over england, but not because of some > porcine variant of mad cow disease: rather, the most implacable foe > of the swine is turning out to be multiculturalism. > > the latest assault came in the benefits department at dudley council, > west midlands, where employees were told that they were no longer > allowed to have any representations of pigs at their desks. some had > little porcine porcelain figurines. others had toys or calendars of > cute little pigs. one had a tissue box depicting winnie the pooh and > piglet. all of this had to go, not because of new some new > anti-kitsch ordinance, but because muslims might be offended ? > particularly now, what with ramadan beginning. how could a pious > muslim in the dudley council, west midlands benefits department > redouble his efforts to conform his life to the will of allah with > all these?igs staring him in the face? it was an insult! > ///> this was not the first anti-pig initiative in britain. in derby, > muslims took offense at plans to restore the statue of the florentine > boar, which had stood in the derby park for over a hundred years > before it was decapitated by a german bomb in 1942. recent plans to > rebuild the boar? head ran into resistance from local muslims. suman > gupta, a local council member, warned: ?f the statue of the boar is > put back at the arboretum i have been told that it will not be there > the next day, or at least it won? be in the same condition the next > day at least. we should not have the boar because it is offensive to > some of the groups in the immediate area.?however, after more than > 2,000 locals signed petitions in favor of the boar, local authorities > decided to bend to public opinion and go ahead with their original > plans to restore the statue. > > /// > > elsewhere in england pigs did not fare so well. in march 2003, > barbara harris, head teacher at park road junior infant and nursery > school in batley, west yorkshire, banned stories mentioning pigs./// > ?ecently,?harris explained, ? have been aware of an occasion where > young muslim children in class were read stories about pigs. we try > to be sensitive to the fact that for muslims talk of pigs is > offensive.?harris didn? mention whether or not she intended to > allow muslim students to possess copies of the qur?n at the school, > despite its repeated mention of how allah cursed jews and turned them > into apes and pigs (2:62-65; 5:59-60; 7:166). > > /// > > why have pigs become so unpopular in britain? mahbubur rahman, a > muslim councillor in west midlands, summed it up in explaining why > the toy pigs had to go: ?t? a tolerance,?he said, ?f people? > beliefs.? > > /// > > how? that again? it? ? tolerance of people? beliefs?to deny to > others the right to display harmless pictures and figurines? mahbubur > rahman seems unacquainted with the dictum, widely attributed to > voltaire, that ? disapprove of what you say, but i will defend to > the death your right to say it.?yet this is what tolerance really > is: the acceptance of the fact that in a free society, some will do > and say things of which one may disapprove, and that one has no > consequent right to command or force them to stop. if this is not > recognized in any given society, that society is not in fact free at > all ?any more than henry ford? offer that ?ou can have a car in > any color you want, as long as it? black?represented a genuine > choice. > > > /// > for rahman instead to equate a british capitulation to muslim > sensibilities with tolerance indicates that he has confused islamic > supremacism with tolerance. this is perhaps not surprising given the > near-universal tendency among muslims and non-muslims alike to laud > medieval muslim spain as a proto-multiculturalist paradise of > tolerance, when actually it was a paradise for islamic supremacists. > christians and jews lived in harmony with muslims only as inferiors. > historian kenneth baxter wolf notes that the after the muslim > conquest, the conquerors imposed new laws ?imed at limiting those > aspects of the christian cult which seemed to compromise the dominant > position of islam.?after enumerating a standard list of the laws > restricting non-muslims (dhimmis) ?no building of new churches, no > holding authority over muslims, distinctive clothing, etc. ?he adds: > ?side from such cultic restrictions most of the laws were simply > designed to underscore the position of the dimmîs as > second-class citizens.? > > /// > > multiculturalism? tolerance? not by any modern standard. and neither > are the disappearing pigs of great britain. > > /// ***************************************************************** ///> > www.faithfreedom.org/oped/barbarastock50927.htm > /// > things that offend islam/// > by barbara j. stock > /// > > burger king will be withdrawing and changing the logo for its ice > cream cups because, if one looks very closely and has a good > imagination, the logo appeared to some muslims to look sort of like > the word allah in arabic if it was viewed from just the right angle. > not wanting to offend, burger king caved in to the constantly > complaining and whining muslims who seem to find some offense in just > about everything these days. one has to wonder just how many western > muslims can even read arabic. > > > /// > the taliban found offense in the ancient statues of buddha in > bamiyan, afghanistan, and blew them to bits. these muslims also > found offense in several smaller and much easier to destroy ancient > clay and wood-carved statues at the same location. all of these > irreplaceable pieces of history were destroyed because some muslims > found them ?ffensive.? should the great pyramids of egypt be > destroyed if someone finds them offensive? > /// > the taliban also found music, flying kites, dancing of any kind, > women leaving the house without a male family member, and balloons > offensive. any woman leaving the house without being covered from > head to toe was so offensive that she risked being beaten to death. > /// > strict islamics find the human female body offensive and feels every > woman should be covered from head to toe. muslims will tell you that > they cover their women out of modesty and respect but this simply > isn? the case. strict islamics believe a woman is born in sin and > is just one living, breathing sin that needs to be covered at all > times so that the public cannot see her shame. if a woman crosses a > man's path while he is praying, he must begin anew because the woman > is offensive to allah. > /// > an incomplete list of people islamics also seem to find offensive is: > all jews, christians, hindus, buddhists, ex-muslims, and all > non-muslims. > /// > these days, it seems that sunni muslims find shia muslims to be > offensive as well. > /// > also offensive is any reference to the quran by non-muslims that does > not expound on how every word is perfect and written by god himself. > anything less than complete agreement is an offense that often > carries a death sentence. just ask salman rushdie, author of > ?atanic verses,?who had to hide for years to stay alive, and theo > van gogh, who paid with his life for speaking the truth about islam. > > /// > this past week, governor mitt romney of massachusetts suggested that > since virtually every terrorist attack around the world has been > carried out by muslims, it might behoove us to listen in on what is > being preached in american mosques. just as a reminder, the 1993 > world trade center bombing was planned with the assistance of muslim > cleric, sheikh omar abdel rahman, better known as the ?lind sheik.? > /// as expected, the council of american/islamic relations (cair) went > ballistic. to no one? surprise, cair did not claim that islamic > governments don? eavesdrop on christian churches. of course, > islamics don? do that; islamic governments just burn churches down, > occasionally with the people still in them. > ///> strict islamic countries find women wearing white socks sexually > provocative and offensive. pictures of humans or animals are > offensive and men who shave their faces are offensive. card playing > is offensive. girls attending school and receiving an education are > also offensive. women who vote are also offensive. > /// > a woman daring to leave her home without permission even to rush her > sick child to a doctor is offensive. of course, female doctors are > offensive so any woman requiring medical care can? receive it > because all the doctors are men. > /// > islamics also seem to be offended by: america, great britain, > poland, israel, australia, spain, italy, japan, russia, and new > zealand, just to mention a few countries. interestingly, islam > doesn? seem to be as offended by france or germany. > /// > in fairness, what islam doesn? find offensive should be examined. > many muslims did not find the murder of 3000 people on 9/11 > offensive. saddam hussein, responsible for the deaths of hundreds of > thousands fellow muslims, was not offensive. forbidding the practice > of other religions in an islamic country is not offensive while > daring to question what might be going on inside a mosque in america, > is terribly offensive. > /// > the murder of thousands of iraqi muslims doesn? seem to offend > islamics, as long the killing is being done by other muslims. if an > american soldier kills a muslim trying to kill him, that is > offensive. the beheading of helpless prisoners by ?reedom fighters? > is not offensive. putting mass murderers in a prison camp that > provides good food, allows time to pray, provides copies of the quran > and prayer rugs, gives medical and dental care, and allows islamic > clerics to provide the prisoners with religious council, is > offensive. > /// > the quran touching the floor is offensive but urinating on or burning > the bible is not. profiling people from islamic countries that > support terrorism is offensive but imprisoning christians for wearing > a cross is not. > /// > teaching people about islam is encouraged, but teaching christianity > is a beheading offense. > /// > islamics are not offended when omar ahmad, co-founder of the council > on american-islamic relations, declares that it is the goal of cair > to replace our constitution with the quran and is incensed if > americans are offended. after all, that is being disrespectful of > the quran. any american who does not want the quran replacing the > constitution and who speaks out against islam is immediately labeled > an ?slamaphobe.? when islam is involved, there is no freedom of > speech. > /// > another thing that doesn? seem to offend many muslims is the killing > of a ten-year-old rape victim. she must have been ?sking for it.?/// > the little vixen soiled the family name and was probably wearing > white socks. also not offensive is the stoning to death of women who > are merely suspected of ?eing with a man not their husband.? > hanging college students who dare to speak out against oppressive and > cruel ayatollahs isn? offensive to many muslims either. > /// > muslims are not offended by the age-old islamic tradition of forcing > their young daughters to marry their 60-year-old uncles. girls as > young as 12 are forced to marry their cousins and occasionally even > their half-brothers. this is done to keep the family money in the > family. however, this practice also produces the genetic defects > caused by constant inbreeding. > /// > what americans should find offensive is how the media, the american > civil liberties union (aclu), cair, and american leftists recoil in > horror if a cruel word is said about islam as they all set about the > business of destroying our own christian-based society. as > socialists and atheists slowly remove all traces of god from america, > islamics are standing ready to fill the void with allah and islamic > law. any american who doesn? believe that we are war with islam > isn? paying attention. > /// > americans need to wake up from their liberal-media and > television-induced stupor. cair and the aclu do not represent > american culture but they are both being allowed to destroy it. that > offends me. it should offend you. > /// > ==================================== /// ----------------- /// to: dtletters@telegraph.co.uk ///sent from the internet (details) /// dear sir/madam, /// with reference to letters about the disappearance of pigs from britain, the forwarded article will be of interest to your readers. /// i can only suggest that you save anything to do with pigs. in few years time these will become collectors items. /// i have saved tesco bags with pigs pictures, they have diasppeared since the last few years. /// ++++++++++++++++++++++ britain's war on pigs by robert spencer ///> > http://frontpagemagazine.com/articles/readarticle.asp?id=19712 > britain's war on pigs by robert spencer > /// > pigs are disappearing all over england, but not because of some > porcine variant of mad cow disease: rather, the most implacable foe > of the swine is turning out to be multiculturalism. > > the latest assault came in the benefits department at dudley council, > west midlands, where employees were told that they were no longer > allowed to have any representations of pigs at their desks. some had > little porcine porcelain figurines. others had toys or calendars of > cute little pigs. one had a tissue box depicting winnie the pooh and > piglet. all of this had to go, not because of new some new > anti-kitsch ordinance, but because muslims might be offended ? > particularly now, what with ramadan beginning. how could a pious > muslim in the dudley council, west midlands benefits department > redouble his efforts to conform his life to the will of allah with > all these?igs staring him in the face? it was an insult! > > this was not the first anti-pig initiative in britain. in derby, > muslims took offense at plans to restore the statue of the florentine > boar, which had stood in the derby park for over a hundred years > before it was decapitated by a german bomb in 1942. recent plans to > rebuild the boar? head ran into resistance from local muslims. suman > gupta, a local council member, warned: ?f the statue of the boar is > put back at the arboretum i have been told that it will not be there > the next day, or at least it won? be in the same condition the next > day at least. we should not have the boar because it is offensive to > some of the groups in the immediate area.?however, after more than > 2,000 locals signed petitions in favor of the boar, local authorities > decided to bend to public opinion and go ahead with their original > plans to restore the statue. > > > /// > elsewhere in england pigs did not fare so well. in march 2003, > barbara harris, head teacher at park road junior infant and nursery > school in batley, west yorkshire, banned stories mentioning pigs. > ?ecently,?harris explained, ? have been aware of an occasion where > young muslim children in class were read stories about pigs. we try > to be sensitive to the fact that for muslims talk of pigs is > offensive.?harris didn? mention whether or not she intended to > allow muslim students to possess copies of the qur?n at the school, > despite its repeated mention of how allah cursed jews and turned them > into apes and pigs (2:62-65; 5:59-60; 7:166). > > > /// > why have pigs become so unpopular in britain? mahbubur rahman, a > muslim councillor in west midlands, summed it up in explaining why > the toy pigs had to go: ?t? a tolerance,?he said, ?f people? > beliefs.? > /// > > > > how? that again? it? ? tolerance of people? beliefs?to deny to > others the right to display harmless pictures and figurines? mahbubur > rahman seems unacquainted with the dictum, widely attributed to > voltaire, that ? disapprove of what you say, but i will defend to > the death your right to say it.?yet this is what tolerance really > is: the acceptance of the fact that in a free society, some will do > and say things of which one may disapprove, and that one has no > consequent right to command or force them to stop. if this is not > recognized in any given society, that society is not in fact free at > all ?any more than henry ford? offer that ?ou can have a car in > any color you want, as long as it? black?represented a genuine > choice. > > > /// > for rahman instead to equate a british capitulation to muslim > sensibilities with tolerance indicates that he has confused islamic > supremacism with tolerance. this is perhaps not surprising given the > near-universal tendency among muslims and non-muslims alike to laud > medieval muslim spain as a proto-multiculturalist paradise of > medieval muslim spain as a proto-multiculturalist paradise of > tolerance, when actually it was a paradise for islamic supremacists. > christians and jews lived in harmony with muslims only as inferiors. > historian kenneth baxter wolf notes that the after the muslim > conquest, the conquerors imposed new laws ?imed at limiting those > aspects of the christian cult which seemed to compromise the dominant > position of islam.?after enumerating a standard list of the laws > restricting non-muslims (dhimmis) ?no building of new churches, no > holding authority over muslims, distinctive clothing, etc. ?he adds: > ?side from such cultic restrictions most of the laws were simply > designed to underscore the position of the dimmîs as > second-class citizens.? > > > /// > multiculturalism? tolerance? not by any modern standard. and neither > are the disappearing pigs of great britain. > > ......................000000000

will the housewives of new jersey return Service Unavailable

Service Unavailable


HTTP Error 503. The service is unavailable.