THE WEST DEALS WITH ISLAMIC TERRORISTS WITH GUNS AND BOMBS. THE HINDUS DEAL WITH THE DEVIL WITH PRAYERS AND PIOUS HOPES.
THE ONLY SOLUTION IS TO CHASE OUT, OR EXTERMINATE, THE "FOREIGN FINGER" THAT HAS BEEN IN INDIA SINCE HER PARTITION IN 1947. THE COUNTRY NEEDS TO BE HINDU RASHTRA IF WE CANNOT DISMANTLE MOHAMMED'S GUNS IN WEST AND EAST. THEY ARE AIMED DIRECTLY AT THE HINDUS WHO HAVE SURVIVED A THOUSAND YEARS OF PERSECUTION AND FORCIBLE CONVERSION.
Irresponsible propoganda that normalcy in the valley is no longer a dream resulted in the mercviless murders of some displaced and exiled Kashmiri Hindus recently.Though they had been eking out their mesirable existence in refugee camps in Jammu but they were enjoying the freedom of conscience more valuable to them than their lives.
One Som Nath Talashi visited his native village,tempted as he was by the false propaganda that he could now convert his land into a profitable asset.
He was found dead a day after his arrival on his own land under mysterious circumstances.
Tej Krishen Bhat of Noorapora (Tral) was attacked by the Jahadi's at Awantipora in South Kashmir during the broad day light.
He succumbed to his injuries in Soura Medical Institute in Srinagar.
A young boy Rinkoo was dragged out from the sole non-Muslim house at Lalpora district Kupwara in North Kashmir and shot on without any fear from security forces or common so-called peace-loving people.
Continuous attacks on few Hindus scattered throughout the valley goe unnoiced.
Why they failed to run out from Kashmir at the time of their 6th mass exodus from the advant of Islam in Kashmir in 1320-AD.
The present mass exodus took place from 1989-90? This has been a painstaking study which does not seem to have been exposed so far.
It was not the choice of those who stayed back at the time of the present mass-exodus nor was it the lure of their assests and good income.
Soon after the move to reduce the strength of the Armed forces in the valley terrorists pointedly started attacking the unarmed ,helpless Hindu families even when their number in the valley has been reduced to a neglegible and pitible level.
Has secularism failed in Kashmir in spite of special status, separate flag, separate constitution?
Was it right for the United States Supreme Court to boldly tell the State of Taxas in 1930 that it could not secede and US itself forced a prolonged civil war to prevent the dismemberment of the U.S.A.?
Some thinkers feel that a constitutional ammendment may be considered to the effect that any call for secession be demed as treason punishable with 5 to 10 year imprisonment and fine and funds for developmental works in the valley withheld till the terrorists stop their activities of loot,arson,merder and mayhem.
Others think that the one who does not respect the Indian national flag, the Indian Constitution, concepts of co-existence, live and let live and is found involved in enemy conspiracies inspired by foreign powers, be deported to the country or his/her choice.
But such ideas are out dated today. These were out dated even on January 6, 1948 when the veteran Congress leader & the first Home Minister of India Sardar Vallahbhai Patel spoke at Lucknow:
"I ask them (Indian Muslims) why they do not unequivocally denounce Pakistan for attacking Indian territory with the aid of Frontier tribesmen. Is it not their duty to condemn all acts of aggression against India?
I want to ask the Indian Muslims only one question. In the recent All-India Muslim Conference (after Independence) why did you not open your mouth on the Kashmir issue?
These things create doubt in the minds of the people. So I want to say a word to them as a friend of the Muslims and it is the duty of good friend to speak frankly.
It is your duty to sail in the same boat and sink or swim together. I want to tell you very frankly that you cannot ride two horses. You select one horse whichever you like best....
Those who want to go to Pakistan can go there and live in peace.Let us live here in peace and work for ourselves.
Those who are disloyal will have to go to Pakistan.Those who are still riding two horses will have to quit Hindustan "
Nehru was the die-hard oponent of the formula of his Congress colleague. Is there a country which grants voting rights to unpatriotic, disloyal citizens directly or indirectly associated with and sympathetic to to the separatist groups capable of creating a State within a State on the basis of its population increasing with amazing rapidity?
When the Prime Minister Manmohan Singh refuses drawing new boarders what steps he can take to stop the threat of another partition keeping in view the utter failure of Nehru to accept his own Home Ministerís Lucknow statement? Even Jinah had proposed the exchange of population.
Plans are there to send the natives back to their ancestral land but why without bringing justice to those who hounded them out from their homes and hearths .
Jihadi holocaust ,to the exiled Kashmiri Hindus is not a misnomer, an accusation,and even less a speculation.It is a historical fact.
The people who have suffered for centuries no longer like to be treated as sheep once they go back.They do not foster vindictiveness, but they warn the world of the danger which sectarianism, when allied with religious intolerance can bring to any contemporary nation.
Submitted for frank comments,