NO JEWS.  NO HINDUS.  NO KAFIRS.  WHITHER SAUDI ARABIA?

Date: 3/17/2004

Comment

................No Jews? Then, no Saudi Visas To US!

New legislation in the U.S. Congress asks Saudi Arabia to clarify its position on tourist visas for Jews.

Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.) introduced legislation Wednesday (March 17, 2004) that would bar Saudi citizens from receiving tourist visas for the United States until the Saudis clarify whether U.S. Jews can seek tourist visas to Saudi Arabia.

The move comes after a Saudi tourism Web site suggested last month that Jews were barred from receiving visas to the kingdom under new policies.

The Saudi Embassy claimed the information on the Web site was a mistake.

"We know they recognized the P.R. problem posed by their Web site; the question is whether they recognize the moral problem posed by their policy, and have moved to correct it," Weiner said.

.........................=============

(DEAR SAUDIS, SUBSTITUTE THE WORD "HINDU" FOR "JEW" IN YOUR LEGISLATION. AS PER KORAN, A HINDU IS A LOT MORE DETESTABLE THAN A JEW WITH WHOM YOUR MOHAMMED ENTERED INTO A CONCORD OF PEACE.

MOREOVER, THE HINDU HAS NO GOD FATHER. SO THERE WILL BE NO RETALIATION BY INDIA. IN FACT THEY WILL BE SO TERRIFIED OF YOUR MIGHT THAT THEY MIGHT DROP THE IDEA OF SRI RAM TEMPLE IN AYODHYA PERMANENTLY.

THEIR CURRENT PRESIDENT AND SUPREME COMMANDER, WITH AN IMPECCABLE ARABIC NAME, ABDUL KALAM (ABD-ULL-LONG-LULL-KALAAM) MAY HAVE HIS TENURE EXTENDED TO THE END OF HIS LIFE. WE KNOW THAT THE CONQUEROR OF EAST BENGAL, GEN. MANECKSHAW, WAS MADE FIELD MARSHAL FOR LIFE EVEN AFTER OUR PRIME MINISTER INDIRA KHAN RETURNED THE CAPTURED TERRITORY TO ISLAM AND HIS "CONQUEST" MEANT SWEET NOTHING!

WHEN THE MUSLIMS OCCUPIED LAHORE, A CITY FOUNDED BY THE SON OF LORD RAM, THERE WAS NO RETALIATION BY INDIA THAT CLAIMS TO BE WEDDED TO SECULARISM.

WHEN YOUR MANLY ARABS OCCUPIED SINDH IN 712 AD, THERE WAS NO REACTION IN INDIA. WHEN THE TALIBAN, EACH ONE OF THEM A TRUE REPLICA OF MOHAMMED, ORDERED THE HINDUS TO WEAR YELLOW BADGES, NOT ONE MOHAMMEDAN ASS IN BHARAT WAS SET ON FIRE.

SO YOU CHOSE THE WRONG TARGET, DEAR SAUDIS. THE RETALIATION BY THE REST OF THE (NON HINDU) WORLD WILL BE SEVERE. HAD YOU CHOSEN THE HINDUS, YOU WOULD HAVE ADDED TO YOUR GLORY.

O' KING OF SAUD, IT IS THE JEWISH MONEY IN THE SHAPE OF ALL THE MILITARY THAT IS GUARDING YOUR THRONE AND LIVES. YOU OUGHT TO HAVE BEEN WISER. A CHICKEN DOES NOT DREAM OF SLAUGHTERING A FOX FOR ITS DINNER.

KICKING AN INDIAN (A HINDU) IN THE BACK, LIKE GENERAL IDI AMIN AND COLONEL RABUKA, WOULD HAVE MADE YOU LOOK A LOT MORE POWERFUL AND MANLY TO THE REST OF MANKIND (AT LEAST ONE FIFTH OF MANKIND WHO ARE LABELLED "INDIAN").

WE UNDERSTAND THAT OUR TERRIFIED INDIA (WHOSE LARGE LIMBS WERE CHOPPED OFF AND LEFT BLEEDING BY HER INDIGENOUS MUSLIMS IN 1947) IS NOT ALLOWED TO SEND A HINDU AS HER AMBASSADOR TO RIYADH.

WHY NOT JUST RESTRICT YOUR VISA RESTRICTINS TO THE "INDIAN" JEWS? THAT WILL LEAVE OUT THE AMERICAN JEWS WHO ENSURE YOUR SAFETY FROM THE "TIGERS AND WOLVES" OF AL QAIDA DAY AND NIGHT? YOU WOULD STILL LOOK GREAT! EVER THOUGHT OF THIS IDEA? A BULLY GOES FOR THE WEAK, NOT FOR THE STRONG AND THEN COME OUT WITH A BLEEDING NOSE.

PROVOKING THE AMERICAN JEWS MAY COST YOU YOUR THRONE AND EVEN LIFE. DON'T FORGET, YOU ARE THE PRIMARY TARGET OF AL QAIDA WHO READ THE KORAN TEN TIMES A DAY.

..........................000000000

[_private/ftarc.htm]